Peace of mind
One up-to-date list and a report instead of searching in the dark.
A role known internationally as a “fractional CIO”, with one difference: I don’t take over the IT department or its budget. I translate the board’s intent into requirements, review IT’s recommendations, and represent the client’s interests in dealings with vendors.
If the answer to any of them is “we don’t know”, that is exactly where I can help. I put these questions to boards, secretaries, county heads and company presidents before decisions are taken and money starts to flow.
One up-to-date list and a report instead of searching in the dark.
Projects finish in line with their goal, because someone watches the whole.
Early warning of risks and an independent opinion before a larger purchase.
The cost of a mistake at this stage. Projects with no owner and no shared list slip quietly, and you learn of the problem when it is already expensive. An advisor usually costs less than a single badly chosen technology, a single wrong vendor or a single trap in a contract.
When there are several projects and the IT department barely keeps up with running the systems, nobody is left to watch the whole picture day to day. As a standing coordinator on the client’s side, I maintain the registers, collect statuses, remind people of deadlines and escalate when something stalls.
The amendment to the Polish National Cybersecurity System Act (KSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. The obligations rest with management, not with the IT department alone: the board is responsible for implementation, must complete training and from 2028 may face penalties. Specialists and vendors do the technical work. But someone has to lead it, and many authorities and companies have no head of IT with time for it. I take on that part as a fractional CIO: I am not a security specialist; I make sure the implementation is complete, documented and on time.
I establish whether, and as what kind of entity, the organisation falls under the Act, and set the scope, the people responsible and the schedule. I keep the documentation: the register of systems and vendors, the risk register, procedures, including the incident reporting path within 24 and 72 hours, and the evidence for the auditor. I keep track of deadlines, of the tasks of your own IT and of vendors, and of the clauses in contracts. I ask vendors, IT and the auditor the questions the board should ask, and check that the answers hold up. Every month the board receives one page: status, risks and decisions to be taken.
Penetration testing, security monitoring (SOC), system configuration or the audit itself. Specialised firms do this work; I help choose them, define the assignment and hold them to account.
Nearest deadlines. By 3 April 2027, an information security management system and incident handling in place; from 3 April 2028, the first audit of essential entities and possible penalties.
When there are several projects and the IT department barely keeps up with running the systems, nobody is left to watch the whole picture day to day. As a standing coordinator on the client’s side, I maintain the registers of projects, actions, risks, decisions and documents, collect statuses, remind people of deadlines and escalate when something stalls. I don’t take over delivery and I don’t decide for you: every action has an owner on your side.
We set the rhythm according to the number of projects and how much time your IT team has:
I advise boards from the perspective of someone who knows both IT and the business, and I gather knowledge so that every project serves the business goals that have been set.
This is the key competence that ties all the stages together: over 20 years of work in many organisations, on the client’s side.
No. I don’t take over the IT department or its budget. I translate the board’s intent into requirements, review IT’s recommendations, and represent the client’s interests in dealings with vendors.
We set the rhythm according to the number of projects and how much time your IT team has: from basic (once a month), through regular (every week) and intensive, to interim for a few months.
No, and I don’t pretend to be. In KSC my role is to lead the implementation on the board’s side: documentation, deadlines, vendors, reporting. Specialised firms do the technical work and the audit; I make sure they get a clear brief and that the board knows what follows from it.
The first conversation takes 30 minutes and costs nothing. I reply within 2 working days.